and now
finally finally subtext is coming together, im so hopeful for it because i think with the amazing writing skills of all the ladies and the design of dave this magazine is going to attract a massive audience. im so excited that it might actually get people reading it and thinking and that people will want to react and write because of it. i love the idea of education.
in other news. lesbians being sacked from their jobs for having babies at a gay friendly company, whatever a gay friendly company is, apparantly they assumed because she was gay she wouldnt want babies, because theyre not normal are they. at least this is whats being said. but isnt it frustrating that deciding not to live like we're told to means we have to abandon all ideals of being a woman... excuse me while i go wash my dungarees.
now magazine did a top 100 beautiful/glamorous women lo and behold jordan or posh didnt make it into top 10 action. in fact a lot of the women picked were of a different generation the classical women of 50s fashion and quieter women of hollywood today (well catherine zeta jones and angelina jolie were there). so is glamour a concept we only understand as being associated with the past? when we see top 100 of women people respect or admire its the ones splashed all over the trash mags making money and being ripped apart day to day by the media and themselves. so beauty is an aspect that is unnattainable and we only admire those like ourselves? or what we see as ourselves. which is nice i guess to the effect that we are all faulty. i dont know. something doesnt hang right.
in personal news
i have a new housemate called vicky and im happy to be living with a girl, excitingly we've also engaged in serious conversations on anorexia, beauty upkeep and why we're slaves to make up, various feminist discussion.. this is ace. no one else would ever talk to me about these things.
i really am on my way to becoming a man hater. if theyd just give it a rest being rubbish.
im still working in a call centre. and its hard and boring and after a ten hour shift sat in the office watching the clouds blow by you kind of want to jump out of the window.
oh. dont catch bird flew.
xx
in other news. lesbians being sacked from their jobs for having babies at a gay friendly company, whatever a gay friendly company is, apparantly they assumed because she was gay she wouldnt want babies, because theyre not normal are they. at least this is whats being said. but isnt it frustrating that deciding not to live like we're told to means we have to abandon all ideals of being a woman... excuse me while i go wash my dungarees.
now magazine did a top 100 beautiful/glamorous women lo and behold jordan or posh didnt make it into top 10 action. in fact a lot of the women picked were of a different generation the classical women of 50s fashion and quieter women of hollywood today (well catherine zeta jones and angelina jolie were there). so is glamour a concept we only understand as being associated with the past? when we see top 100 of women people respect or admire its the ones splashed all over the trash mags making money and being ripped apart day to day by the media and themselves. so beauty is an aspect that is unnattainable and we only admire those like ourselves? or what we see as ourselves. which is nice i guess to the effect that we are all faulty. i dont know. something doesnt hang right.
in personal news
i have a new housemate called vicky and im happy to be living with a girl, excitingly we've also engaged in serious conversations on anorexia, beauty upkeep and why we're slaves to make up, various feminist discussion.. this is ace. no one else would ever talk to me about these things.
i really am on my way to becoming a man hater. if theyd just give it a rest being rubbish.
im still working in a call centre. and its hard and boring and after a ten hour shift sat in the office watching the clouds blow by you kind of want to jump out of the window.
oh. dont catch bird flew.
xx

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home